Agenda and minutes

Improvement & Review Commission - Local Plan - Saunderton Area Action Plan - Task & Finish Group
Wednesday, 7th October, 2015 7.00 pm

Venue: The Clare Foundation, The Saunderton Estate, Wycombe Road, Saunderton, HP14 4BF

Contact: Liz Hornby 

Items
No. Item

15.

Apologies for Absence

To receive apologies for absence.

Minutes:

Apologies for absence were received from Councillors J Savage and Mrs S Adoh.

16.

Declarations of Interest

Minutes:

None.

17.

Welcome from the Chairman

Supporting documents:

Minutes:

The Chairman welcomed everyone to the meeting and outlined the agenda for the evening.

 

The Chairman made a short presentation (attached).

18.

Introduction to the Issues

To receive an introduction to the issuers by a WDC Planning Officer.

Supporting documents:

Minutes:

Penelope Tollitt, Head of Planning and Sustainability, WDC, made a presentation setting out the facts and issues to be considered at the meeting.  For information, the presentation is attached to the Minutes.

19.

Representations from the Floor

Discussion and feedback from the floor.

Supporting documents:

Minutes:

The following people made representations to the panel –

 

Councillor Carl Etholen

Mr Stringfellow

Mr Bruce Johnston

Mr Powell-Thorne

Mr Stephen Busby

Ms Clare Rogers

Mr John Wilkins

Mr Clive Allom

Ms Elizabeth Martin

Ms Lucy Murfitt

Mr David Howlett

Mr Peter Malaure

Mr Patrick Voss

Mr David Thompson

Mr Simon Breese

Ms Susy Peycke

Mr Ivan Rogers

Ms Carey Andrews

Mr Stu Campbell

Mr Mike Blackwell

Mr Mike Malaure

Mr Wayne Harris

Mrs Julie Stringfellow

Mr Kim Martin

Mrs Rita Drew

Mrs Margaret Whitfield

Mr Andrew Sage

Ms Judith Hunter

Mr Mark Jenkins

 

During those representations, the following points and questions were raised –

 

·         The Saunderton station was a focal point which would attract around 70 more train journeys.

·         Where would the extra people using the station park their cars?

·         If 1000 houses were built all around the area, this would impact by vastly increasing the traffic.

·         It was considered that Chiltern Railways did not want to stop more trains at Saunderton.

·         Haw Lane was becoming a ‘rat run’ with children crossing at school times. Concern was raised that Haw Lane would get worse in terms of traffic volume which, in turn, would put school children at risk.

·         If additional traffic used Haw Lane, this would exacerbate problems with moving out on to the A4010.

·         That the Molins site was an irreplaceable asset. Sustainability would lessen if only housing was built on the land.

·         By adding more vehicles to the area would not lessen the carbon footprint.

·         The provision of a retirement village would be an asset to the area and would not significantly add to the traffic volumes in the area. 

·         A care home or retirement village would bring employment to the area.

·         Why did WDC not welcome applications for care homes?

·         The community would be better served with a Neighbourhood Plan particularly as this was being promoted by central government.

·         Large scale housing was inappropriate for the area due to the AONB and Green Belt.

·         There would be increase delivery vehicles if housing were built, as well as additional school traffic.

·         A team had already been assembled to look at a Neighbourhood Plan, who would meet the necessary timescales.

·         That traffic volumes were currently unsustainable.

·         Due to no pavements in places, dog walkers already were put at risk, but if pavements were built, this would put walkers at greater risk as it would narrow even further the already narrow road.

·         Flooding underneath the two railway bridges, one in Haw Lane and the other in Slough Lane, occurred every time it rained.  This had a knock-on effect with traffic as far back as the Pedestal roundabout in West Wycombe.

·         Flooding was an ongoing issue particularly in relation to West’s Yard as everything is on a slope and the Golden Cross pond acts as a soakaway meaning the pond could not be moved or worked on. The Ministry of Defence (MoD) were causing problems, particularly Ministry Wharf. The villagers were informed during the flooding in 2014 that the MoD  ...  view the full minutes text for item 19.